LLaVA-Next-LLaMA3-8B: benchmark results

Provider: LLaVA Team. Access: Open.

Aggregate Rating 1438 ± 26, rank #4289 of 10916 rated models, from 78 benchmark results.

Strongest benchmark results

BenchmarkScoreMetricPercentile
X-PCR - Lesion Characterization79.44Accuracy (%) at stage 3, characterizing lesion morphology an95
MIR-SafetyBench - Temporal Continuity54.26Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)83.3
MIR-SafetyBench - Temporal Jump52.48Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)83.3
MIR-SafetyBench - Spatial Juxtaposition53.42Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)77.8
MIR-SafetyBench60.87Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)72.2
MIR-SafetyBench - Logical Analogy55.66Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)72.2
MIR-SafetyBench - Logical Causality65.36Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)72.2
MirrorBench - Level 2 (Implicit Mirror Discovery)0.11Average score (mean of task success rate, step-wise improvem70.6
Epoch AI - Science Qa73.7Score69.6
MIR-SafetyBench - Semantic Complementarity60.71Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)69.4
MIR-SafetyBench - Spatial Embedding61.77Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)66.7
MIR-SafetyBench - Semantic Relevance57.24Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer)61.1

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/model?slug=llava-next-llama3-8b · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-08.