MIR-SafetyBench - Logical Causality: leaderboard

MIR-SafetyBench attack success rate (percent of responses the HarmBench-Llama-2-13b-cls classifier labels harmful, lower is safer) on its causality instances, where a harmful outcome is shown and the model is asked to infer the process that leads to it. Tsinghua CoAI group and Beihang University, 2026.

Metric: Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.121.43#225
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)46.79#111
3GPT-4o Mini53.57#1627
4Gemini 2.5 Pro58.93#262
5QVQ-72B-Preview73.21#1173
6InternVL3-8B73.93#1695
7Gemini 2.5 Flash75.71#452
8InternVL3-78B77.14#733
9GPT-4o78.21#741
10Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct82.5#1055
11InternVL3-38B84.64#905
12GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)90#1061 (GLM-4.1V-9B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mir-safetybench-logical-causality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.