MIR-SafetyBench - Semantic Complementarity: leaderboard

MIR-SafetyBench attack success rate (percent of responses the HarmBench-Llama-2-13b-cls classifier labels harmful, lower is safer) on its complementarity instances, where a harmful image is cut into tiles that the model must reassemble before answering. Tsinghua CoAI group and Beihang University, 2026.

Metric: Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.18.57#225
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)32.5#111
3Gemini 2.5 Pro38.21#262
4GPT-4o Mini49.64#1627
5Gemini 2.5 Flash60.71#452
6GPT-4o61.79#741
7InternVL3-78B65.71#733
8QVQ-72B-Preview74.29#1173
9InternVL3-8B74.64#1695
10InternVL3-38B83.93#905
11Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct88.57#1055
12GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)88.93#1061 (GLM-4.1V-9B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mir-safetybench-semantic-complementarity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.