MIR-SafetyBench - Logical Analogy: leaderboard

MIR-SafetyBench attack success rate (percent of responses the HarmBench-Llama-2-13b-cls classifier labels harmful, lower is safer) on its analogy instances, where the prompt asks the model to apply one technique to both a benign domain and a malicious topic. Tsinghua CoAI group and Beihang University, 2026.

Metric: Attack Success Rate (%; lower is safer). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.15.03#225
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)26.1#111
3Gemini 2.5 Pro27.36#262
4Gemini 2.5 Flash42.77#452
5GPT-4o Mini55.35#1627
6GPT-4o58.49#741
7InternVL3-78B67.3#733
8QVQ-72B-Preview67.92#1173
9InternVL3-8B78.62#1695
10InternVL3-38B81.13#905
11Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct81.76#1055
12GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)93.4#1061 (GLM-4.1V-9B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mir-safetybench-logical-analogy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.