Midm-2.0-Base-Instruct: benchmark results

Provider: KT. Released 2025-07-04. Access: Open.

Aggregate Rating 1522 ± 26, rank #1921 of 10800 rated models, from 47 benchmark results.

Strongest benchmark results

BenchmarkScoreMetricPercentile
TriBench-Ko - Omission61.4Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Omission risk items (out100
TriBench-Ko - Adjudicative Overreach84.4Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Adjudicative Overreach r83.3
Polar (US) - Sociocultural Axis84.25Sociocultural-axis ICAT (0-100), the StereoSet idealized con75.7
Horangi 4 - KorQuAD 1.085.15F1 (x100)73.1
Horangi 4 - KoBBQ92Accuracy (%)72.6
Polar (South Korea) - Economic Axis87.24Economic-axis ICAT (0-100), the StereoSet idealized context 67.6
TriBench-Ko - Hallucination83.3Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Hallucination risk items66.7
TriBench-Ko - Nondeterminism77.6Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Nondeterminism risk item66.7
TriBench-Ko - Prompt Sensitivity78.2Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Prompt Sensitivity risk 66.7
Polar (US)76.12Total ICAT (0-100), the StereoSet idealized context associat64.9
Polar (South Korea)88.17Total ICAT (0-100), the StereoSet idealized context associat59.5
TriBench-Ko - Overcompliance66.8Macro-F1 (0-100) on the TriBench-Ko Overcompliance risk item58.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/model?slug=midm-2-0-base-instruct · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.