X-RIC BARX - Policy Impact: leaderboard

BARX v1 TableI source-local O-RAN TLM candidates: L3 LLaMA3-8B; Q7B Qwen7B; Q4B Qwen4B; QT Qwen:latest; MT Mistral:latest; TL TinyLLaMA:latest; DS DeepSeek7B. SectionII frozenLLM+trained256Dstateencoder versus SectionIV fine-tuned wording unresolved; retain paper-specific trained system identities and never map to stock models. Three regimes(T,p)=(0.01,0.8),(0.1,0.9),(0,1), five20query trials each,300responses/model. Latency and pairwise determinism not capability scores. Policy impact is signed difference of average episodic reward under TLM-guided vsRL-only control;300second dynamictraffic episodes. No theoretical finite bounds published. Minimum is parser validation guard only, not theoretical lower bound. Metric: Mean episodic reward difference vs RL-only. Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22269v1

Metric: Mean episodic reward difference vs RL-only. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1X-RIC TLM Q7B (BARX paper2610.22269)6.09
2X-RIC TLM DS (BARX paper2610.22269)5.88
3X-RIC TLM L3 (BARX paper2610.22269)5.39
4X-RIC TLM MT (BARX paper2610.22269)5.06
5X-RIC TLM Q4B (BARX paper2610.22269)4.04
6X-RIC TLM QT (BARX paper2610.22269)3.09
7X-RIC TLM TL (BARX paper2610.22269)-2.75

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=x-ric-barx-policy-impact · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.