WuYuEval - Foundation Module - Accuracy: leaderboard

Accuracy on the Foundation Module of WuYuEval (arXiv 2608.07529v1, Appendix Table 7): 4,590 audited closed-ended multiple-choice questions on solid waste management across six task types and eight domains. Percent; higher is better. Standard and thinking modes of the same model are separate rows.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 33 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.594.64#87
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)92.77#71
3GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)92.31#265 (GLM-4.6)
4DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)92.16#210 (DeepSeek V3.2)
5Qwen 3 Max91.83#213
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)91.37#210 (DeepSeek V3.2)
7Kimi K2 (Thinking)91.26#252 (Kimi K2)
8Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)90.83#323 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
9GPT-5.290.04#115
10Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct89.63#336
11Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)87.86#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
12Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)87.49#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
13GLM-4.6 (Thinking)84.97#265 (GLM-4.6)
14Gemma 3 27B (IT)82.29#528
15Qwen 3 14B (Reasoning)81.37#542 (Qwen 3 14B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wuyueval-foundation-module-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.