WorkBench 2026 - Side Effects: leaderboard

WorkBench (Styles et al., 2024; corrected release 2026) evaluates workplace agents on 690 templated tasks in a sandbox of calendar, email, website-analytics, CRM and project-management databases with 26 tools, graded by comparing the final sandbox state with the ground truth. This board is the share (%) of tasks in which the agent took a wrong, harmful action such as emailing the wrong person; lower is better.

Metric: Side-effect rate (%): share of tasks in which the agent took a wrong, harmful action (for example emailing the wrong person) on the corrected 2026 release of WorkBench: 690 templated workplace tasks over a sandbox of five databases (calendar, email, website analytics, CRM, project board) and 26 tools, graded by comparing the final sandbox state with the ground truth; one native tool-calling agent loop for every model, up to 20 steps, temperature 0 where allowed; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Fable 51.9#27
2Claude Opus 4.82.5#56
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)2.9#94
4Gemini 3.5 Flash3#101
5GPT-5.53.9#49
6Kimi K2.66.8#178
7Claude Sonnet 4.68.8#161
8DeepSeek V4 Pro12.8#188
9GPT-513#167
10GPT-4o15.1#741
11Claude Haiku 4.516.7#568
12GPT-5.416.8#123
13GLM-4.617#486
14O317.5#228
15GPT-5.118.1#229

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=workbench-2026-side-effects · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.