WolfBench (OpenClaw): leaderboard

Metric: Mean Success Rate (%, 89 Terminal-Bench 2.0 tasks). Source: wolfbench.ai. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Claude Opus 4.7 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.11; timeout=3600s; thinking=off; providers=anthropic; source-model=Claude%20Opus%204.7)75
2Gemini 3.5 Flash (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=high; providers=google; source-model=Gemini%203.5%20Flash)72.19
3GPT-5.4 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.11; timeout=3600s; thinking=xhigh; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.4)71.01
4GPT-5.5 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=off; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.5)69.38
5Gemini 3.5 Flash (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=medium; providers=google; source-model=Gemini%203.5%20Flash)69.38
6Gemini 3.5 Flash (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=low; providers=google; source-model=Gemini%203.5%20Flash)67.42
7Claude Sonnet 5 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.1; timeout=3600s; thinking=high; providers=anthropic; source-model=Claude%20Sonnet%205)61.8
8GPT-5.4 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.11; timeout=3600s; thinking=low; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.4)61.24
9Claude Opus 4.6 (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.11; timeout=3600s; thinking=max; providers=anthropic; source-model=Claude%20Opus%204.6)58.99
10Kimi K2.6 [Moonshot AI] (WolfBench Run: agent=openclaw; version=2026.3.11; timeout=3600s; thinking=-; providers=openrouter; source-model=Kimi%20K2.6%20%5BMoonshot%20AI%5D)58.43

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wolfbench-openclaw · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-09.