WolfBench (Hermes): leaderboard

Metric: Mean Success Rate (%, 89 Terminal-Bench 2.0 tasks). Source: wolfbench.ai. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.6 Sol (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.7.7.2; timeout=3600s; thinking=max; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.6%20Sol)84.49
2gpt-6-astra (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.8.31; timeout=3600s; thinking=max; providers=openai; source-model=gpt-6-astra)83.37
3GPT-5.6 Terra (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.7.7.2; timeout=3600s; thinking=max; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.6%20Terra)80.9
4GPT-5.6 Luna (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.7.7.2; timeout=3600s; thinking=max; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.6%20Luna)78.65
5GPT-5.5 (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=xhigh; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.5)74.16
6GPT-5.5 (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.4.23; timeout=3600s; thinking=medium; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.5)72.81
7Gemini 3.5 Flash (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.5.16; timeout=3600s; thinking=high; providers=google; source-model=Gemini%203.5%20Flash)70.34
8GLM-5.2 [W&B] (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.6.19; timeout=3600s; thinking=-; providers=wandb; source-model=GLM-5.2%20%5BW%26B%5D)70.22
9Gemini 3.5 Flash (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.5.16; timeout=3600s; thinking=medium; providers=google; source-model=Gemini%203.5%20Flash)69.29
10GPT-5.4 (WolfBench Run: agent=hermes; version=v2026.3.30; timeout=3600s; thinking=medium; providers=openai; source-model=GPT-5.4)67.42

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wolfbench-hermes · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-09.