WildTrace: leaderboard

WildTrace (2026) asks multi-hop questions whose evidence is spread naturally across long incident reports and lesser-known literary works, supplied in full at up to about a million tokens. Answers are graded against criterion-level rubrics by three non-contestant LLM judges; the score is mean rubric credit in percent, a document longer than the model context window scoring zero, and higher is better.

Metric: Rubric credit (%; mean of three non-contestant LLM judges (Claude Sonnet 4.6, Qwen3.5-Plus, Gemini 2.5 Flash) grading answers against criterion-level rubrics, over 481 multi-hop questions on 214 long technical reports and literary works given in full without evidence spans, up to about 1M tokens; a document longer than the model context window is not sent and scores zero; higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)75.3#94
2Claude Opus 4.872.6#56
3GPT-5.571#49
4GLM-5.270.9#138
5Qwen 3.7 Max70.1#145
6Claude Opus 4.669.2#102
7Qwen 3.6 Plus66.7#222
8Qwen 3.7 Plus65.7#207
9GPT-5.462.2#123
10Gemini 2.5 Pro61.4#266
11GPT-4.160.4#495
12GPT-5.142.1#229
13Qwen 3 Max35.2#403
14Kimi K2.635.1#178
15DeepSeek V3.233#406

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtrace · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.