WildTableBench - Value Modification: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Value Modification subtype (C4-M), 928 human-verified questions over 402 real-world table images, free-form answers judged by GPT-5.2 against the reference answer, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.2 (High)66.7
2Gemini 3 Pro61.9
3Gemini 3 Flash57.1
4Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)52.4
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)42.9
6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)42.9
7Seed 2.0 Pro (High)42.9
8Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct33.3
9Claude Opus 4.6 (High)33.3
10GPT-5 Mini (High)28.6
11Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct23.8
12GLM-4.6V23.8
13O3 (High)9.5
14Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct4.8
15Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)4.8

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtablebench-value-modification · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.