WildTableBench - Hypothetical Condition: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Hypothetical Condition subtype (C4-H), 928 human-verified questions over 402 real-world table images, free-form answers judged by GPT-5.2 against the reference answer, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro82.1
2GPT-5.2 (High)60.7
3Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)53.6
4Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)53.6
5Gemini 3 Flash50
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)50
7Claude Opus 4.6 (High)50
8Seed 2.0 Pro (High)42.9
9GPT-5 Mini (High)32.1
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)25
11Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct21.4
12GLM-4.6V17.9
13Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct14.3
14Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)10.7
15O3 (High)10.7

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtablebench-hypothetical-condition · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.