WildTableBench - Conditional Verification: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Conditional Verification subtype (C3-C), 928 human-verified questions over 402 real-world table images, free-form answers judged by GPT-5.2 against the reference answer, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro75.8
2Gemini 3 Flash69.7
3Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)69.7
4Seed 2.0 Pro (High)66.7
5GPT-5.2 (High)63.6
6Claude Opus 4.6 (High)57.6
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)54.5
8Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)51.5
9GLM-4.6V48.5
10Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)48.5
11Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct42.4
12GPT-5 Mini (High)39.4
13Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct36.4
14GPT-4o33.3
15Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)30.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtablebench-conditional-verification · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.