WildTableBench - Cell Locating: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Cell Locating subtype (C1-L), 928 human-verified questions over 402 real-world table images, free-form answers judged by GPT-5.2 against the reference answer, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro71.4
2Seed 2.0 Pro (High)67.3
3GPT-5.2 (High)65.3
4Claude Opus 4.6 (High)65.3
5Gemini 3 Flash61.2
6Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)51
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)46.9
8Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)40.8
9Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct30.6
10Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct28.6
11Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)28.6
12GPT-5 Mini (High)24.5
13GLM-4.6V20.4
14Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct16.3
15O3 (High)16.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtablebench-cell-locating · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.