WildTableBench - Basic Numerical: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Basic Numerical subtype (C2-B), 928 human-verified questions over 402 real-world table images, free-form answers judged by GPT-5.2 against the reference answer, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro77.1
2Claude Opus 4.6 (High)54.3
3Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)51.4
4GPT-5.2 (High)45.7
5Seed 2.0 Pro (High)40
6Gemini 3 Flash37.1
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)37.1
8Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)37.1
9Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)34.3
10Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct28.6
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)28.6
12GPT-5 Mini (High)28.6
13GLM-4.6V25.7
14Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct17.1
15O3 (High)14.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=wildtablebench-basic-numerical · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.