WebVR - Interaction and Motion: leaderboard

Metric: Rubric score (0-100) on the interaction and motion criteria (hover feedback, scroll animations, state transitions) on WebVR's 175 webpage-recreation tasks: the model watches a screen-recording video of a synthesized webpage (plus its image assets) and writes one standalone HTML file; the page is rendered and replayed under a fixed interaction script and a Kimi-K2.5 judge checks it against the task's atomic visual rubric (32-248 binary criteria) using the code and the rendered video; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K2.560.1#139
2GPT-5.2 (Thinking)59.97#105 (GPT-5.2)
3Claude Sonnet 4.659.06#85
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)56.5#54
5Claude Opus 4.654.33#60
6Gemini 2.5 Pro48.66#145
7Gemini 3 Flash48.43#93
8Gemini 3 Pro46.86#77
9Seed 2.0 Pro45.88#111
10Qwen 3.5 397B A17B41.96#141
11Gemini 2.5 Flash39.76#237
12Claude 3.7 Sonnet37.38#241
13Seed 1.836.33#136
14Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)29.3#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
15GPT-4.126.71#240

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=webvr-interaction-and-motion · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.