WebVR: leaderboard

Metric: Overall rubric score (0-100): share of rubric criteria satisfied on WebVR's 175 webpage-recreation tasks: the model watches a screen-recording video of a synthesized webpage (plus its image assets) and writes one standalone HTML file; the page is rendered and replayed under a fixed interaction script and a Kimi-K2.5 judge checks it against the task's atomic visual rubric (32-248 binary criteria) using the code and the rendered video; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K2.579.14#139
2Claude Sonnet 4.678.49#85
3GPT-5.2 (Thinking)77.93#105 (GPT-5.2)
4Claude Opus 4.677.33#60
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)76.69#54
6Seed 2.0 Pro71.88#111
7Gemini 3 Flash69.49#93
8Gemini 3 Pro67.32#77
9Gemini 2.5 Pro63.09#145
10Seed 1.861.98#136
11Qwen 3.5 397B A17B61.33#141
12Claude 3.7 Sonnet61.21#241
13Gemini 2.5 Flash55.62#237
14Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)46.8#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
15GPT-4.145.85#240

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=webvr · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.