WeaveBench - Overall Score: leaderboard

WeaveBench (2026) tests computer-use agents on 114 long-horizon real-world tasks that need GUI, command-line, code and API tools together; this series comes from the paper table in which each model drives a fixed OpenClaw agent runtime at its best thinking mode. The overall score is the mean per-task rubric score (0-100); higher is better.

Metric: Mean per-task score (0-100) on 114 long-horizon real-world computer-use tasks that need GUI, CLI, code and API tools together, each model run as the backbone of a fixed OpenClaw agent runtime with the full hybrid tool pool at its best thinking mode; each deliverable is graded by a five-layer rubric pipeline whose correctness tier caps the task score, printed 0-1 and x100 here; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.7 (High)48.2#79 (Claude Opus 4.7)
2GPT-5.5 (High)46.6#49 (GPT-5.5)
3GPT-5.4 (High)46.5#123 (GPT-5.4)
4GPT-5.3 Codex (High)45.6#116 (GPT-5.3 Codex)
5GPT-5.2 Codex (High)32.1#189 (GPT-5.2 Codex)
6Qwen 3.5 397B A17B31.8#246
7GPT-5.1 Codex (High)22.6#288 (GPT-5.1 Codex)
8Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)22.3#94
9Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)9.2#887

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=weavebench-overall-score · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.