VisReason (Vision-Centric) - Open-Ended: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 309 open-ended questions (judged correct or not by GPT-5-mini against the reference answer) of VisReason, pooled over the 10 reasoning categories, zero-shot with chain-of-thought prompt templates, one per answer format; rows not shaded gray in the paper use explicit reasoning (GPT-5 and Gemini 3 Pro at low reasoning effort); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview) (Low)72.5
2GPT-5 (Low)61.5
3GPT-5 Mini (High)60.2
4GPT-5 Mini (Medium)55.3
5GPT-5.2 (Thinking)52.1
6GPT-5 Mini (Low)50.5
7O4 Mini48.5
8Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)43.7
9GPT-5 Nano29.8
10Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)29.8
11Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct28.6
12Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)25.6
13Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)25.1
14Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct23.9
15Gemini 2.5 Flash12

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=visreason-vision-centric-open-ended · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.