VisReason (Vision-Centric) - Board Reasoning: leaderboard
Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Board Reasoning category (structural reasoning: infer the correct outcome of a board-game position shown as an image) of VisReason, answers scored by format (regular-expression match, GPT-5-mini judge for open-ended answers, IoU above 0.5 for boxes), zero-shot with chain-of-thought prompt templates, one per answer format; rows not shaded gray in the paper use explicit reasoning (GPT-5 and Gemini 3 Pro at low reasoning effort); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 22 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3 Pro (Preview) (Low) | 51.1 |
| 2 | GPT-5 (Low) | 44.4 |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 (Thinking) | 43.7 |
| 4 | GPT-5 Mini (High) | 42.2 |
| 5 | GPT-5 Mini (Medium) | 36.3 |
| 6 | Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking) | 30.4 |
| 7 | GPT-5 Mini (Low) | 30.4 |
| 8 | Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking) | 27.4 |
| 9 | O4 Mini | 26.7 |
| 10 | GPT-5 Nano | 22.2 |
| 11 | GPT-4o | 18.5 |
| 12 | Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking) | 17 |
| 13 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | 15.6 |
| 14 | Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking) | 14.1 |
| 15 | Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct | 13.1 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=visreason-vision-centric-board-reasoning · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.