VideoVIBE - Workflow Validity: leaderboard

The Workflow Validity subdimension (semantic and logical consistency) of VideoVIBE (2026): video MLLMs diagnose which failure a recorded session of a one-shot generated website shows, from the video and page source. Accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Failure-diagnosis accuracy (%; questions of the Workflow Validity subdimension of Semantic and Logical Consistency; zero-shot single-choice diagnosis from the interaction video and the page source code (Video+HTML), about 1.7K questions built from 6,338 verified failures of one-shot generated web applications recorded under human operation; free-form answers mapped deterministically to an option). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite72.83#364
2Gemini 2.5 Flash69.57#453
3Gemini 3 Flash66.3#164
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B66.3#482
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)58.7#94
6GLM-4.6V52.17#701
7Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct48.91#981
8Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)48.91#887
9Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)47.83#712
10Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct43.48#871
11MiMo-V2.542.39#354

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=videovibe-workflow-validity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.