VideoVIBE - Visual Hierarchy: leaderboard

The Visual Hierarchy subdimension (visual and motion fidelity) of VideoVIBE (2026): video MLLMs diagnose which failure a recorded session of a one-shot generated website shows, from the video and page source. Accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Failure-diagnosis accuracy (%; questions of the Visual Hierarchy subdimension of Visual and Motion Fidelity; zero-shot single-choice diagnosis from the interaction video and the page source code (Video+HTML), about 1.7K questions built from 6,338 verified failures of one-shot generated web applications recorded under human operation; free-form answers mapped deterministically to an option). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)51.11#887
2Gemini 2.5 Flash43.11#453
3Gemini 3 Flash40#164
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)39.11#94
5Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct39.11#981
6Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)39.11#712
7Qwen 3.5 35B A3B36.89#482
8GLM-4.6V36.89#701
9MiMo-V2.536.44#354
10Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct31.11#871
11Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite30.67#364

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=videovibe-visual-hierarchy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.