Video-MME-Logical: leaderboard

Video-MME-Logical (2026) tests temporal-logical reasoning in video with procedurally generated clips whose answers come from the generating program: state tracking, sequential counting, temporal ordering, dynamic spatial reasoning and structural composition, 3,750 test videos, exact-match scoring. The board is overall accuracy in percent; human annotators reach about 96, and higher is better.

Metric: Overall accuracy (%) over all test videos; Video-MME-Logical: 3,750 procedurally generated test videos in 25 task categories under five temporal-logical operations (state tracking, sequential counting, temporal ordering, dynamic spatiality, structural composition), each at easy, medium and hard settings; zero-shot, 2 fps; exact-match accuracy of the tagged multiple-choice or fill-in answer; human 95.9; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)28.6#94
2GPT-5.422.7#123
3Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct12.5#846
4Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct11.9#981
5Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct11.8#871
6Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)10.3#712
7Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct7.4#1833
8Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)6.6#887
9Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct5.8#904

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-mme-logical · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.