Video-IFBench - Nested: leaderboard

Task-gated instruction satisfaction rate on nested instructions requiring the correct root-to-leaf path in Video-IFBench (2026). Percent, higher is better.

Metric: Task-gated instruction satisfaction rate (%; TISR on nested instructions, where the model must follow the one true root-to-leaf path of a condition tree; checklist-based instruction following on 1.5K video samples with 39 semantic and format constraint types; a response counts only if it addresses the active task (the correct branch for conditional instructions) and satisfies every checklist item, judged by Qwen3.5-397B-A17B-Instruct or verified programmatically; Gemini and Doubao get video at 1 fps, GPT-5.4 50 frames, vision-only models frames plus timestamped subtitles). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 38 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro46#135
2Gemini 3 Flash30.7#159
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Thinking)28.2#242 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
4Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)20#358 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
5Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)19.8#480 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
6Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Thinking)19.7#329 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)
7Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro-26021514.4#149
8Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)11.9#803 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)10.3#451
10Gemma 4 31B (IT)10#343
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct9.5#870
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct8.5#982
13Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)7.9#242 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
14GPT-5.47.6#121
15Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)6.9#358 (Qwen 3.5 27B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-ifbench-nested · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.