Video-HOCA - Fine-grained Recognition (Ontological): leaderboard

Metric: Macro-F1 (%) of choosing the correct anomaly description among four options (three human-reviewed GPT-OSS-120B distractors) on Video-HOCA's ontological anomalies (entity-centred: an object or agent is internally inconsistent, unstable or does what it should not); 16 uniformly sampled frames, deterministic Instruct-mode decoding (temperature 0, 1,024 tokens); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)90.2#183 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
2Gemini 3 Flash85.6#93
3Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct84.1#276
4Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct83.7#401
5Gemini 2.5 Flash82.8#237
6Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct81.6#365
7Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)74.9#363 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
8Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct67.9#643
9GPT-4o59.3#333
10Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)32.7#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-hoca-fine-grained-recognition-ontological · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.