Video-HOCA - Fine-grained Recognition (Causal): leaderboard

Metric: Macro-F1 (%) of choosing the correct anomaly description among four options (three human-reviewed GPT-OSS-120B distractors) on Video-HOCA's causal anomalies (relation-centred: valid entities interact in a way that violates a physical regularity); 16 uniformly sampled frames, deterministic Instruct-mode decoding (temperature 0, 1,024 tokens); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)85.7#183 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
2Gemini 3 Flash80.9#93
3Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct79#276
4Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct76.6#401
5Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct73.4#365
6Gemini 2.5 Flash73#237
7Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)67.1#363 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
8Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct60.9#643
9GPT-4o57.1#333
10Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)25.3#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-hoca-fine-grained-recognition-causal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.