VibeSearchBench: leaderboard

Long-horizon proactive web search: across 200 expert-written professional and everyday tasks (half Chinese, half English), an agent works with a simulated user who reveals needs one stage at a time, then extracts a knowledge graph of what it found; VibeSearchBench (Xiaohongshu, 2026). Triplet F1 in percent against the annotated ground-truth graph, judged by an LLM and averaged over the Pro and Daily subsets and 3 runs, under the OpenClaw agent harness; higher is better.

Metric: Triplet F1 (%; an LLM judge matches the knowledge graph the agent extracts after a multi-turn session with a progressive-disclosure user simulator against the annotated ground-truth graph; OpenClaw agent harness; mean of VibeSearch-Pro and VibeSearch-Daily; mean of 3 runs per task). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2028. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.630.3#100
2DeepSeek V4 Pro27.64#181
3Kimi K2.626.17#173
4Seed 2.0 Pro25.23#209
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)23.62#91
6Qwen 3.5 397B A17B23.1#242
7GPT-5.421.92#121

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=vibesearchbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.