VIA-Bench (Pattern Match) - Motion Illusions: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the motion illusions questions, answer letter extracted by regular expressions; VIA-Bench's 1,004 human-verified multiple-choice questions on illusory and anomalous images, every option set including a never-correct 'Not Sure' option; zero-shot with an answer-format instruction, temperature 0.8 where supported (model defaults otherwise), mean of five runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)96.28#338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
2Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)95.51#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
3O4 Mini94.87#172
4O390.51#121
5Claude Opus 4.1 (20250805)90.38#126
6Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct78.97#643
7Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)69.87#64
8Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct56.03#364
9GPT-5 Chat47.18#233
10Gemini 2.5 Pro46.54#145
11Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)41.4#211
12GPT-4o ChatGPT35.51
13GPT-5 Mini25.13#176
14Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)20.38#286
15GPT-4o (2024-11-20)20.13#369

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=via-bench-pattern-match-motion-illusions · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.