VIA-Bench: leaderboard

Metric: Average accuracy (%) over the six categories (visual anomalies, colour, motion, Gestalt, geometric and spatial, general visual illusions) under both answer-extraction protocols (regular-expression match and a GPT-4.1-mini judge), the unweighted mean of the 12 cells; VIA-Bench's 1,004 human-verified multiple-choice questions on illusory and anomalous images, every option set including a never-correct 'Not Sure' option; zero-shot with an answer-format instruction, temperature 0.8 where supported (model defaults otherwise), mean of five runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)69.23#64
2O360.2#121
3Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)59.72#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
4Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)57.07#338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
5O4 Mini55.19#172
6Gemini 2.5 Pro55.01#145
7Claude Opus 4.1 (20250805)53.52#126
8Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct49.68#364
9GPT-5 Mini49.54#176
10Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct48#643
11Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)46.61#211
12GLM-4.5V45.57#339
13GPT-4o (2024-11-20)43.44#369
14Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)39.46#286
15GPT-4o ChatGPT36.61

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=via-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.