VAMPS (Analytical): leaderboard

Direct analytical accuracy on the English versions of the 218 VAMPS (2026) graph-solvable exam questions, answered without tools as in standard mathematics benchmarks, thinking disabled. Percent; higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the English versions of the 218 Konkour-seed questions (Iranian university entrance exam algebra and calculus, chosen so that plotting reveals the answer; four-option multiple choice), direct analytical solving without tools (the standard protocol); thinking disabled for every model, temperature 0, answers read from a required JSON block; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.698.2#161
2Claude Opus 4.798.2#79
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)97.2#246 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
4Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)97.2#394 (Gemma 4 31B)
5Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)95.9#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
6Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct92.2#981
7Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct92.2#585
8Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)90.4#453 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
9Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)90.4#615 (Gemma 4 26B A4B)
10GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)89#123 (GPT-5.4)
11Gemma 3 27B77.5#1631
12Ministral 3 14B75.7#1845
13Gemma 3 12B68.3#2000
14Ministral 3 8B67.4#2023
15Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)64.7#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=vamps-analytical · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.