UnpredictaBench - Text: leaderboard

KS@100 on the 160 Text problems, which name or describe a canonical distribution to sample from, from UnpredictaBench (2026), a benchmark of sampling from target distributions: the percent of problems for which 100 samples from the model, drawn at temperature 1.0 with reasoning off, are not rejected by a two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test against ground-truth samples at p below 0.0001. Higher is better.

Metric: KS@100 (%): share of the 160 Text problems (named or described canonical distributions) for which 100 samples from the model (100 independent calls at temperature 1.0, reasoning effort none, up to 5 retries for a parseable answer) are not rejected by a two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test against ground-truth samples at p < 0.0001; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)28.13#406 (DeepSeek V3.2)
2GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)25.63#123 (GPT-5.4)
3Llama 3.1 70B Instruct23.13#1546
4GPT-4o21.25#741
5Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-251221.25#2579
6nemotron-3-nano-30B-a3B (Non-reasoning)20.63#1875 (nemotron-3-nano-30B-a3B)
7Qwen 3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)14.38#4810 (Qwen 3.5 2B)
8Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)11.88#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
9Llama 3.2 1B Instruct10#9047
10GPT-4o Mini9.38#1623
11OLMo 3 7B Instruct7.5#6860
12Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)6.88#430 (Grok 4.1 Fast)
13Claude Sonnet 4.65.03#161
14Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)3.8#246 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct3.75#4246

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=unpredictabench-text · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.