UAV-DualCog - Landmark-Driven Action Decision: leaderboard
UAV-DualCog (2026) evaluates multimodal LLMs on self-state and environment-state reasoning of a UAV in simulated aerial scenes, with structured answers in instant mode. This board asks which way the UAV should move to approach a target landmark; answer accuracy over 1,024 items in percent, higher is better.
Metric: Answer accuracy (%; 1,024 questions asking which way the UAV should move to approach a target landmark; structured JSON answers on renders of simulated AerialVLN scenes, the discrete answer scored whatever the predicted box or interval; instant mode with explicit thinking disabled where a model allows it; higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 36 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.3 Instant | 62.3 | #130 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 61 | #161 |
| 3 | Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | 57.5 | #482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B) |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | 53.6 | #49 (GPT-5.5) |
| 5 | Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | 52.2 | #803 (Qwen 3.5 9B) |
| 6 | Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) | 50.6 | #359 (Qwen 3.5 27B) |
| 7 | MiMo-V2.5 (Non-reasoning) | 49.7 | #354 (MiMo-V2.5) |
| 8 | Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) | 49 | #331 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B) |
| 9 | Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) | 47.5 | #1175 (Qwen 3.5 4B) |
| 10 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) | 46.2 | #246 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B) |
| 11 | GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) | 44.2 | #701 (GLM-4.6V) |
| 12 | Qwen 3.7 Plus (Non-reasoning) | 43.4 | #207 (Qwen 3.7 Plus) |
| 13 | Qwen 3.6 Plus (Non-reasoning) | 42.5 | #222 (Qwen 3.6 Plus) |
| 14 | GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) | 36 | #123 (GPT-5.4) |
| 15 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Non-reasoning) | 35.9 | #364 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite) |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=uav-dualcog-landmark-driven-action-decision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.