UA-JudgeExam: leaderboard

UA-JudgeExam (2026) is built from the question bank the Ukrainian High Qualification Commission of Judges publishes for appellate-judge candidates: four-option legal items with official keys, filtered to remove items a model can answer from the options alone. Score is multiple-choice accuracy with the question shown, on a 400-item sample of the filtered set, in percent; chance is 25 and higher is better.

Metric: Full-condition accuracy (%; question and four options shown, one letter answered, on a 400-item sample of the 8,128 items that remain after the Claude Haiku 4.5 option-only gate; denominators exclude unparseable answers (DeepSeek R1 352, Pixtral Large 365, Nova Micro 388, Llama 3.1 8B 202); greedy decoding where the provider accepts a temperature; chance is 25). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol95.8#30
2Claude Sonnet 4.674#161
3DeepSeek R166.8#473
4Nova Pro58#1555
5Claude Haiku 4.557.5#568
6Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)55.2#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
7Llama 3.3 70B Instruct54#1357
8Gemma 3 12B (IT)47.2#1837
9Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-251246.3#1858
10Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)46#1126 (Nova 2.0 Lite)
11Nova Micro43.6#2717

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ua-judgeexam · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.