Trip+ - User Simulation: leaderboard

Trip+ (2026) has tool-using LLM agents plan and revise minute-level travel itineraries over multi-turn conversations with profiled travelers, changing requests and environment disruptions, in a fixed travel sandbox. This board is the simulated traveler experience, the median rating of four LLM judges playing the profiled traveler. Scores are on a 0 to 100 scale; higher is better.

Metric: Simulated traveler experience (0-100), a rate scaled by 100: median of four profile-conditioned LLM judges (Qwen, Claude, Gemini and GPT families) rating each activity of the final plan for comfort and preference fit, averaged over tasks, on multi-turn personalized travel planning with traveler profiles, request changes and environment disruptions, the same OpenAI-compatible function-calling scaffold over a fixed travel sandbox for every model, temperature 0 where supported; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.451.84#123
2Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)51.67#341 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
3Kimi K2.651.64#178
4Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)51.41#462 (Qwen 3.6 35B A3B)
5Seed 2.0 Pro51.28#211
6DeepSeek V4 Pro51#188
7GPT-5.4 Mini50.85#389
8Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)50.77#94
9GLM-5.150.14#179
10MiniMax-M2.749.92#518
11Gemma 4 31B49.23#394
12Gemma 4 26B A4B49.16#615
13Hy3-preview48.66#316
14Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)48.62#144
15Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)48.21#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trip-plus-user-simulation · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.