Trip+ - Soft Preferences: leaderboard

Trip+ (2026) has tool-using LLM agents plan and revise minute-level travel itineraries over multi-turn conversations with profiled travelers, changing requests and environment disruptions, in a fixed travel sandbox. This board is satisfaction of profile-derived preferences such as pace and comfort, averaged over the plans an agent produces when a plan is expected. Scores are on a 0 to 100 scale; higher is better.

Metric: Soft-preference satisfaction (0-100), a rate scaled by 100: profile-derived rule scores for pace, comfort, transport, budget and interests, averaged over the plans that pass the response-mode gate, on multi-turn personalized travel planning with traveler profiles, request changes and environment disruptions, the same OpenAI-compatible function-calling scaffold over a fixed travel sandbox for every model, temperature 0 where supported; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)66.26#341 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)63.89#94
3Kimi K2.663.8#178
4Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)63.75#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
5DeepSeek V4 Pro62.58#188
6GPT-5.4 Mini62.07#389
7Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)61.72#144
8GLM-4 32B61.41#1299
9GLM-5.161.36#179
10MiniMax-M2.760.76#518
11Seed 2.0 Pro60.31#211
12Hy3-preview59.57#316
13Gemma 4 26B A4B59.4#615
14GPT-5.458.54#123
15DeepSeek V3.258.42#406

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trip-plus-soft-preferences · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.