Trip+ - Feasibility: leaderboard
Metric: Itinerary feasibility (0-100), a rate scaled by 100: deterministic checks of structure, grounded venues and transport, timing, opening hours, transfers and cost arithmetic, averaged over the plans that pass the response-mode gate, on multi-turn personalized travel planning with traveler profiles, request changes and environment disruptions, the same OpenAI-compatible function-calling scaffold over a fixed travel sandbox for every model, temperature 0 where supported; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 18 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 88.12 |
| 2 | GLM-5.1 | 84.63 |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 | 76.69 |
| 4 | Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | 75.21 |
| 5 | Kimi K2.6 | 74.72 |
| 6 | Gemma 4 31B | 74.27 |
| 7 | Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) | 73.93 |
| 8 | Hy3-preview | 72.23 |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) | 70.99 |
| 10 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | 67.61 |
| 11 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 67.55 |
| 12 | Seed 2.0 Pro | 67.31 |
| 13 | DeepSeek V3.2 | 64.61 |
| 14 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 64.55 |
| 15 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 55.96 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trip-plus-feasibility · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-29.