TRACE Bench - Language Quality: leaderboard

TRACE Bench per-turn language quality: an LLM judge checks each roleplay reply for fluency, grammar, usage and internal-logic problems, without scoring persona, length or diversity (TRACE Bench, arXiv 2608.11236v1, Table 8). Percent over scorable replies; higher is better.

Metric: Per-turn LLM-judge language quality (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1MiMo-V2.599.03#196
2MiMo-V2.5-Pro98.73#167
3DeepSeek V4 Flash98.58#155
4Claude Sonnet 4.698.16#94
5Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)98.16#152 (Kimi K2.5)
6GPT-5.597.87#33
7Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)97.66#212 (Gemma 4 31B)
8DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)97.41#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
9Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)97.27#678 (Qwen 3 8B)
10Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)96.98#542 (Qwen 3 14B)
11Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)96.59#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
12MiniMax-M2.796.53#270
13GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)95.51#149 (GLM-5)
14Mistral Small 3.290.77#608
15Hermes-4-14B84.91#789

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trace-bench-language-quality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.