TRACE Bench - Diversity: leaderboard

TRACE Bench response diversity: a normalized repetition penalty from character-bigram Jaccard similarity between each reply's sentences and the model's earlier sentences (TRACE Bench, arXiv 2608.11236v1, Table 8). Percent; higher means less repetition. An auxiliary response-level dimension of the overall score.

Metric: Normalized repetition-penalty score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)95.43#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
2Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)93.49#212 (Gemma 4 31B)
3GPT-5.592.58#33
4Claude Sonnet 4.692.22#94
5DeepSeek V4 Flash91.79#155
6Ministral 3 14B90.11#664
7Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)89.48#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
8Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)88.7#152 (Kimi K2.5)
9GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)88.24#149 (GLM-5)
10MiniMax-M2.787.82#270
11MiMo-V2.5-Pro87.59#167
12MiMo-V2.586.62#196
13Qwen 3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)78.61#1114 (Qwen 3.5 2B)
14Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)74.76#542 (Qwen 3 14B)
15Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)66.45#678 (Qwen 3 8B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trace-bench-diversity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.