ToolMaze (Failure-Aware Prompt) - Perturbation Recovery Rate: leaderboard

ToolMaze (2026) tests tool-using LLM agents on 400 DAG-structured tasks over 270 tools, each also run with injected tool failures that are explicit or implicit and transient or permanent. This board is the percentage of failure-exposed runs in which the agent retries, switches tool path or aborts correctly, under a prompt that warns of tool failures and outlines recovery strategies; higher is better.

Metric: Perturbation recovery rate (%): share of runs exposed to an injected failure in which the agent retries a transient fault, switches to an alternative tool path or aborts an unsolvable task, averaged over the four failure modes; 400 DAG-structured tool-use tasks (four topology levels) over 270 tools, each also run under four injected tool-failure modes (explicit or implicit, transient or permanent); sandboxed, 25 agent steps, temperature 1, a failure-aware prompt that warns of tool failures and outlines recovery strategies (the clean runs keep the standard prompt); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)56.91#94
2GPT-5.553.46#49
3DeepSeek V4 Pro47.33#188
4Claude Sonnet 4.646.54#161
5GLM-5.136.98#179
6Qwen 3.5 397B A17B35.34#246
7Qwen 3.6 27B35.32#341
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B32.13#482
9MiniMax-M2.726.83#518

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=toolmaze-failure-aware-prompt-perturbation-recovery-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.