ToolFailBench: leaderboard

ToolFailBench (2026) checks whether LLM agents use tools faithfully on single-turn tasks in finance, medicine, law, cybersecurity and real estate, where mock tool returns contradict plausible remembered values. The clean tool-use rate is the percent of the 750 tool-required tasks in which the model calls the tool and reports its result without skipping, ignoring or fabricating, labelled by a rule classifier and two LLM judges; higher is better.

Metric: Clean tool-use rate (%; share of the 750 tool-required single-turn tasks whose trace calls the needed tool and answers with the returned value, without skipping the tool, ignoring its result or fabricating output; labels by majority vote of a rule classifier and two LLM judges; mock tool returns contradict plausible prior values; temperature 0, 1,024-token output limit; higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Grok 4.386.33#333
2Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)84.11#430 (Grok 4.1 Fast)
3Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct82.68#1215
4Qwen 3.6 27B79.33#341
5Claude Sonnet 4.579.28#250
6GPT-5.4 Mini79.14#389
7QwQ-32B79.04#910
8Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct79#1092
9Qwen 3.6 35B A3B78.47#462
10Gemma 4 31B (IT)78.12#342
11Qwen 3.5 27B77.38#359
12Claude Haiku 4.576.47#568
13DeepSeek V4 Flash75.84#258
14GLM-4.7 Flash71.49#1259
15Qwen 3.5 9B70.03#803

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=toolfailbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.