TimeSpot - Environment Type: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) of the predicted environment type (such as urban, suburban or rural) on TimeSpot's 1,455 ground-level photographs from 80 countries, each answered zero-shot in a structured multi-field schema from the image alone; a Gemini-2.5-Flash judge normalizes each field (synonyms, abbreviations) and marks it correct or not; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct75.21#643
2GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)68.54#457 (GLM-4.1V-9B)
3O4 Mini66.64#172
4Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking)64.47#237 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
5Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)64.32#237 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
6GLM-4.5V62.51#339
7Mistral Medium 3.161.72#400
8InternVL3-78B61.37#345
9Gemini 2.0 Flash60.96#331
10Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct60.82#443
11Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct60.43#264
12GPT-5 Mini60.01#176
13Gemini 2.0 Flash (Thinking)59.93#331 (Gemini 2.0 Flash)
14Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct59.04#611
15Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct58.14#364

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=timespot-environment-type · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.