TimeSage-MT - L2 Multi-Skill Analysis: leaderboard

TimeSage-MT (2026) evaluates LLM agents in multi-turn time-series analysis dialogues with verifiable, code-derived answers, here under its Code-Enabled Reasoning setting in which the model writes Python that a sandbox executes. The board averages the outcome score in percent over the 60 L2 tasks, dialogues of two to four dependent analytical steps across turns; higher is better.

Metric: Outcome score (%) on the 60 L2 multi-skill analysis tasks (5-12 turns, 2-4 dependent analytical steps): per-task mean of the applicable outcome dimensions (numerical accuracy, factual verification, GPT-5.4-judged analytical quality and code correctness, plus decision making at L4); Code-Enabled Reasoning setting (the model writes Python, a sandbox runs it, the model answers from stdout; 240 multi-turn time-series analysis tasks over 8 domains), temperature 0, reasoning effort high where supported and medium for GPT-5.3-Codex; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around May 2028. 6 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.638.3#161
2GLM-5.137.5#179
3GPT-5.3 Codex34.96#116
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B33.63#331
5MiniMax-M2.733.42#518
6Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)31.74#144

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=timesage-mt-l2-multi-skill-analysis · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.