TimeSage-MT - Decision Making: leaderboard

TimeSage-MT (2026) evaluates LLM agents in multi-turn time-series analysis dialogues with verifiable, code-derived answers, here under its Code-Enabled Reasoning setting in which the model writes Python that a sandbox executes. This board is the decision-making dimension on the 60 L4 tasks, a GPT-5.4 judge score in percent for the validity, reasoning and completeness of the final decision; higher is better.

Metric: Decision making (%): GPT-5.4 judge score of the final structured decision on the 60 L4 tasks (validity, reasoning quality, completeness), averaged over the applicable tasks; Code-Enabled Reasoning setting (the model writes Python, a sandbox runs it, the model answers from stdout; 240 multi-turn time-series analysis tasks over 8 domains), temperature 0, reasoning effort high where supported and medium for GPT-5.3-Codex; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 6 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1MiniMax-M2.764.08#518
2Qwen 3.5 122B A10B63.93#331
3GLM-5.162.88#179
4GPT-5.3 Codex59.45#116
5Claude Sonnet 4.659.38#161
6Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)52.69#144

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=timesage-mt-decision-making · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.