TIDE (Evolving Documents, Gold Context) - Temporal Scenario Short Answer: leaderboard

Part of TIDE (Sobhani et al., 2026) on temporally evolving Bangladesh customs instruments, with the governing instrument supplied in the prompt: short answers to 363 scenarios set at a stated point in time, judged by a three-model council for meaning and required dates, where a wrong date scores zero. Strict accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Strict accuracy (%; 363 temporal scenario short-answer questions judged by the council with the hard date gate; TIDE, 3,050 expert-verified questions over 644 Bangladesh customs instruments (1969-2025); free-form answers are judged by a council of Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.1 by majority vote with a hard date gate, deterministic tasks by exact match; strict accuracy without the partial-rubric credit; thinking enabled, temperature 0; gold context: the governing instrument text is supplied in the prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (Thinking)75.29#176 (GPT-5.2)
2GPT-OSS-120B65.64#700
3Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)64.06#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
4Gemini 3.5 Flash63.45#101
5Qwen 3.6 35B A3B62.35#462
6Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)62.02#256 (Kimi K2.5)
7Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)59.83#394 (Gemma 4 31B)
8GLM-4.652.17#486

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tide-evolving-documents-gold-context-temporal-scenario-short-answer · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.