TIDE (Evolving Documents, Gold Context) - Relative-Time QA: leaderboard

Part of TIDE (Sobhani et al., 2026) on temporally evolving Bangladesh customs instruments, with the governing instrument supplied in the prompt: given an anchor date and an offset, the model computes the target date and returns the value in force then, over 463 questions judged by a three-model council with a date gate. Strict accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Strict accuracy (%; 463 questions giving an anchor date and an offset, answered with the value in force at the computed date and judged by the council; TIDE, 3,050 expert-verified questions over 644 Bangladesh customs instruments (1969-2025); free-form answers are judged by a council of Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.1 by majority vote with a hard date gate, deterministic tasks by exact match; strict accuracy without the partial-rubric credit; thinking enabled, temperature 0; gold context: the governing instrument text is supplied in the prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)68.03#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
2GPT-5.2 (Thinking)59.66#176 (GPT-5.2)
3Gemini 3.5 Flash49.58#101
4Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)49.56#256 (Kimi K2.5)
5Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)49.28#394 (Gemma 4 31B)
6Qwen 3.6 35B A3B48.88#462
7GPT-OSS-120B46.73#700
8GLM-4.636.43#486

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tide-evolving-documents-gold-context-relative-time-qa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.