TIDE (Evolving Documents, Gold Context) - Open-Ended: leaderboard

Part of TIDE (Sobhani et al., 2026) on temporally evolving Bangladesh customs instruments, with the governing instrument supplied in the prompt: 487 open-ended questions judged by a three-model council for meaning and required dates, where a wrong date scores zero. Strict accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Strict accuracy (%; 487 open-ended questions judged by the council with the hard date gate; TIDE, 3,050 expert-verified questions over 644 Bangladesh customs instruments (1969-2025); free-form answers are judged by a council of Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.1 by majority vote with a hard date gate, deterministic tasks by exact match; strict accuracy without the partial-rubric credit; thinking enabled, temperature 0; gold context: the governing instrument text is supplied in the prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (Thinking)61.04#176 (GPT-5.2)
2Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)54.06#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
3GPT-OSS-120B53.44#700
4Gemini 3.5 Flash49.16#101
5Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)48.94#256 (Kimi K2.5)
6Qwen 3.6 35B A3B48.73#462
7Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)43.93#394 (Gemma 4 31B)
8GLM-4.638.05#486

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tide-evolving-documents-gold-context-open-ended · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.