TIDE (Evolving Documents, Gold Context) - Context Misalignment: leaderboard

Metric: Strict accuracy (%; 116 questions whose preamble states a superseded version, judged by the council against the value in force; TIDE, 3,050 expert-verified questions over 644 Bangladesh customs instruments (1969-2025); free-form answers are judged by a council of Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.1 by majority vote with a hard date gate, deterministic tasks by exact match; strict accuracy without the partial-rubric credit; thinking enabled, temperature 0; gold context: the governing instrument text is supplied in the prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2031. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)27.62
2GPT-5.2 (Thinking)26.73
3Qwen 3.6 35B A3B22.42
4GPT-OSS-120B19.89
5Gemini 3.5 Flash19.88
6Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)19.85
7GLM-4.617.23
8Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)14.71

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tide-evolving-documents-gold-context-context-misalignment · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-29.