TIDE (Evolving Documents, Gold Context): leaderboard

TIDE (Sobhani et al., 2026) tests version resolution over temporally evolving documents: 3,050 expert-verified questions about 644 Bangladesh customs instruments issued from 1969 to 2025, whose correct answer depends on the version in force at the queried date. This board supplies the governing instrument text in the prompt; the score is strict accuracy in percent macro-averaged over eight task types, free-form answers judged by a three-model council with a hard date gate; higher is better.

Metric: Macro-averaged strict accuracy (%; mean over the eight task types; TIDE, 3,050 expert-verified questions over 644 Bangladesh customs instruments (1969-2025); free-form answers are judged by a council of Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.1 by majority vote with a hard date gate, deterministic tasks by exact match; strict accuracy without the partial-rubric credit; thinking enabled, temperature 0; gold context: the governing instrument text is supplied in the prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (Thinking)68.49#176 (GPT-5.2)
2Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)64.39#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
3Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)63.27#256 (Kimi K2.5)
4Gemini 3.5 Flash62.45#101
5Qwen 3.6 35B A3B61.13#462
6Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)60.05#394 (Gemma 4 31B)
7GPT-OSS-120B57.11#700
8GLM-4.650.38#486

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tide-evolving-documents-gold-context · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.