The Aggregate - Lichess Pairwise Strength (25 Pairs): leaderboard
Choose which of two target players had the higher established pre-game Lichess rapid Glicko-2 rating, using one anonymized game per player. The frozen sample pairs all 50 players from 25 games into 25 comparisons. Every model sees the same target colors, moves, result and time control, with identities, ratings, links and earlier guesses hidden. Medium reasoning is requested with an 8,192-token output cap and no tools. Accuracy uses all 25 categorical choices equally; higher is better. Five reversed-order repeats are diagnostics, not scored items. This task reuses the games from the numerical rating benchmark and is not independent evidence. Only complete panels are ranked. The public evidence includes every pair, label, choice and explanation, plus the recorded amendment retaining choices when a confidence number contradicted them.
Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: theaggregate.ai. 16 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) | 88 | #3 (Claude Opus 5.5) |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium) | 88 | #10 (Claude Sonnet 5.5) |
| 3 | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | 88 | #18 (Gemini 3.8 Flash) |
| 4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Medium) | 84 | #54 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)) |
| 5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium) | 84 | #56 (Gemini 3.5 Flash) |
| 6 | Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium) | 84 | #20 (Gemini 3.7 Flash) |
| 7 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime (Medium) | 84 | |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium) | 80 | #8 (Claude Fable 5.1) |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) (Medium) | 80 | #78 (Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)) |
| 10 | Gemini 3.6 Flash (Medium) | 80 | #41 (Gemini 3.6 Flash) |
| 11 | GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) | 80 | #16 (GPT-5.6 Sol) |
| 12 | GPT-6 Sol (Medium) | 76 | #14 (GPT-6 Sol) |
| 13 | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | 76 | #9 (GPT-6.1 Sol) |
| 14 | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | 72 | #66 (GPT-5.6 Luna) |
| 15 | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | 72 | #6 (GPT-6 Astra) |
Method and evidence
Run by The Aggregate · Oct 13, 2026
Read method and notes
25 random player pairs drawn from the same 25 games as Guess the chess rating. Each of the 50 players appears in exactly one primary comparison. Each prompt identifies one target color in each of two different games and supplies anonymized PGNs, result and time control. Ratings, names, links and earlier model predictions are hidden.
The answer key is which target had the higher pre-game Lichess rapid Glicko-2 rating. Models choose A or B. Accuracy counts all 25 choices equally; higher is better. All sixteen contestants completed the same frozen sample, with medium reasoning and an 8,192-token output cap including reasoning. No tools or model-to-model judging are involved.
This is a separate task from numerical rating prediction. The two boards reuse games and should not be treated as independent evidence. The models' earlier numerical guesses are retained as a comparison baseline, not additional model scores on this board.
- Always choose Game B: 60.0%
- Unbiased random choice (expected): 50.0%
- Eighteen pairs have rating gaps of at least 500; only two have gaps below 200. Ten pairs contain exactly one player below 1000; none contain two. This small, deliberately broad sample does not represent the Lichess population.
- Five reversed-order repeats per model are consistency diagnostics and do not enter the score. The displayed cost includes these repeats. A changed answer can reflect order effects or variation between runs.
- A recorded validation amendment retained categorical choices when the confidence number contradicted them. All choices were kept unchanged, with no retries or inversions; contradictory confidence values are excluded from confidence diagnostics. The public evidence records the amendment and every answer.
- Chance and constant-choice rows are references, not model observations. Rank eligibility requires all 25 primary comparisons.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=the-aggregate-lichess-pairwise-strength-25-pairs · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-12.